Consultation is open from 3 August 2026 9:00am to 25 September 2026 5:00pm
Policy CC/FM: Managing flood risk
1. Flood risk from all sources will be managed using the sequential, risk-based approach taking into account the impacts of climate change, set out in the National Planning Policy Framework and National Planning Practice Guidance. Development proposals, including change of use, will be supported where:
a. The sequential test and, if necessary, the exception test have been passed and demonstrate that the development is acceptable, having regard to actual and residual flood risks from all sources and taking into account the impacts of climate change;
b. Built development has been sequentially located within the site to avoid any areas of flood risk;
c. The development does not lead to an increase in flooding elsewhere and, where, possible reduces overall flood risk;
d. There is a safe access and escape route for future users of the development;
e. The development does not affect the integrity of existing flood and surface water management assets;
f. The ongoing maintenance and management of any necessary flood defences or flood mitigation measures have been agreed with the relevant bodies, and the necessary agreements are in place;
g. The peak rate of run-off over the lifetime of the development, allowing for climate change, is no greater for the developed site than it was for the undeveloped greenfield site. Betterment must be provided on previously developed sites;
h. The post-development volume of run-off, allowing for climate change over the development’s lifetime, is no greater than it would have been for the undeveloped site (if this cannot be achieved, then the limiting discharge is 2 litres per second for all events up to the 100-year return period event);
i. The development is designed so that the flooding of properties in and adjacent to the development would not occur for a 1-in-100-year event, plus an allowance for climate change and in the event of local drainage system failure; and
j. finished floor levels are 300mm above the 1-in-100-year flood level (plus an allowance for climate change), and, where appropriate and practicable, 300 millimetres above adjacent highway levels.
2. Unless exceptional circumstances can be demonstrated, proposals in Flood Zone 3 (taking into account the effects of climate change) that would introduce a ‘highly vulnerable’ or ‘more vulnerable’ use at basement level or ground-floor-only level will not be permitted.
Managing Flood Water
3. If a proposal is considered to be acceptable within the 1% annual probability flood area (Flood Zone 3), taking into account the impacts of climate change, it must not decrease flood storage capacity, impair flow performance, accelerate flooding onset, or create unsustainable flood storage that requires ongoing silt removal, maintenance, or renewal.
4. If a proposal is within a functional floodplain (Flood Zone 3b), developers must ensure the floodplain’s capacity to store or move water is maintained or improved. Development will only be permitted where it results in no loss of floodplain performance.
Flood Risk Assessments
5. A site-specific Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) appropriate to the scale and nature of the development will be required for the following:
a. All sites that include land within Flood Zones 2 and 3;
b. Sites within Flood Zone 1 with a site area of 1 hectare or more;
c. Sites within Flood Zone 1 in locations that are identified as being at greater flood risk in the future, taking into account the effects of climate change;
d. Sites within Flood Zone 1 where there is a risk of flooding from surface water, or are designated as an area with critical drainage problems; and
e. Sites with land that may be subject to other sources of flooding, where its development would introduce a use of higher flood risk vulnerability.
6. The FRA should consider all forms of flooding, taking into account the effects of climate change, and include an assessment of flood risk to and created by the proposed development. FRAs should also demonstrate how the development will be made safe for its lifetime, including, where appropriate, the mitigation measures that will be incorporated to manage residual flood risk.
Supporting information
4.39. The NPPF (2024) requires a sequential, risk-based approach to flooding, to avoid development in areas at high risk of flooding and steer development to areas at lower risk. All types of flooding should be considered, including fluvial (from rivers), surface water, groundwater, and sewer and reservoir flooding. Development projects also need to consider both current flood risk and future flood risk, which may be greater because of climate change. As well as minimising risk to the development itself, development should not increase flood risk elsewhere and, where possible, reduce the risk of flooding downstream, such as by reducing run-off rates using sustainable drainage systems (SuDS). Development represents an opportunity to plan for climate change adaptation by making space for water, safeguarding land expected to flood in the future, considering the use of green infrastructure in managing flood water, and by enlarging the active floodplain away from vulnerable land uses. Developers are encouraged to work with flood risk management authorities early in the design process to identify and support opportunities to make Greater Cambridge more resilient to flooding.
4.40. The Councils have produced a Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA), which identifies areas in Greater Cambridge that are at risk of flooding from all sources and considers the anticipated impact of climate change. The SFRA has been used to inform the selection of sites for allocation for development by following a sequential approach and avoiding high risk areas.
4.41. When assessing the flood risk, applicants should refer to the maps in the latest SFRA and data published by the Environment Agency on their Flood Map for Planning, which covers fluvial and surface water flooding and their reservoir flood maps which may provide more up-to-date information on the different sources of flooding that can impact a site or a development proposal. The effects of climate change should also be factored in any assessment of flood risk. The Flood Map for Planning currently includes modelled climate-change-adjusted flood zones, but the effects of climate change are also expected to be modelled for other sources of flooding – applicants should refer to these climate change models (or their successors) when assessing flood risks and possible mitigation measures that might be required to make a development safe.
4.42. The level of assessment and mitigation needed to make a development safe from flood risk will vary on a case-by-case basis. For example, where hydraulic modelling of a watercourse within or adjacent to a site is not available or is out-of-date, modelling may be required as part of a site-specific FRA to define the extents and depths of fluvial flood risk at the site. Sometimes, a Flood Risk Emergency Plan may be needed to ensure that appropriate measures are in place during a flooding event – applicants should consider the Flood Risk Emergency Plans for New Development guidance jointly prepared by the Association of Directors of Environment, Economy, Planning and Transport and the Environment Agency to determine appropriate emergency and evacuation measures for a development. The Cambridgeshire Flood and Water SPD or successor documents and the Government’s national planning practice guidance on Flood risk and coastal change provides further guidance on what may need to be included in a site-specific Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) and how FRAs should be carried out. These guidance documents (or their successor documents) should be referred to when preparing a planning application.
4.43. The appropriate responsible bodies, including the Environment Agency, Cambridgeshire County Council as Lead Local Flood Authority, Internal Drainage Boards and Anglian Water, should be consulted as appropriate early in the design process for any new development or redevelopment.
Tell us what you think
For further guidance on how to submit comments, please see the Representation Guidance Note.
All comments must be received by 25 September 2026 at 5pm.